Hello, Dear Reader:
Someone (we’re not sure to whom to give credit) once described fear as an acronym:
We’ve all felt fear from time to time, whether it was a simple case of being startled, an overwhelming sense of dread, or somewhere in between. So, the question is, can fear be justified? Not the quick surge of fear that takes us unawares, but the long-standing constant fear that can eat away at our psyche. After all, fear is always about anticipation of an event, not the result of same.
There’s an old saying that goes something like this (copied from memory, so please forgive any inaccuracies):
Where there is fear
there is danger.
Consequently, where there is no fear
there is no danger.
If the man and the tiger
are not one,
then the tiger may attack
out of fear.
But if the man and the tiger are truly one
then the tiger will not attack.
For what animal
would knowingly attack itself?